nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair on the offender and also the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by regulation." It really is well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or girl usually do not approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they're able to do if they will Minimize off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that is a major, the few is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by law.
The lots of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it's made very clear that police is free to get action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities matter to legislation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. In case the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-field duties in the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
13. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is proven as well as employee is found guilty after because of process of legislation, it is the prerogative from the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the different penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed isn't proportionate with the seriousness from the act of misconduct isn't satisfactory but the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a very structured and lawful method. Read more
Lots of the volumes (like more recent volumes than the library's holdings) will also be obtainable online through the Caselaw Access Project.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were told with the boy’s past, they requested if their children were Harmless with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they'd almost nothing to worry about.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons getting their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to do away with the candidature of the petitioner. Read more
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf with the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for your dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all acting in their Positions with DCFS.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Relating the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice isn't served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service of your grievance notice is actually a mandatory necessity as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation calls for that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) If your organization is transprovincial.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative on the regulation laid down because of the Supreme Court from the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Therefore, the competent authority of the parent department in the petitioner as well as Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount with the petitioner and fork out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits towards the petitioner to which he is entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the website respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of your petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale powering their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and sometimes interpret the wider legal principles.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are usually not binding, but might be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.